Riley — Stanford Children's Hospital Patient Story

San Francisco Bay Area / Stanford, CA

Read Full Transcript of This Video

Transcript: Riley — Stanford Children's Hospital Patient Story

**Riley's Mother:** We met Riley when she was two. She came to us when we lived in Indiana as a foster child.

She had a tumor that wrapped around her leg and her lymph nodes and needed to be placed with somebody that could help get her through her treatment.

**Sheri Spunt, MD ,MBA, Pediatric Oncologist, Stanford Children's Health:** So when Riley was first diagnosed, she was living in Indiana at the time and she was about 22 months of age and developed Rhabdomyosarcoma Sarcoma, which is a soft tissue tumor. It arose in her leg.

My understanding is that she came through the foster care system to live with her family here.

Riley was apparently complaining of some leg pain when she first arrived here in California. And so she had some imaging studies done that showed a mass in the area where her cancer had previously been. That arose some suspicions about whether she had a recurrence of her cancer.

**Riley's Mother:** It was a shock. We were thinking we were going to go in there and they were going to say, you know, the abnormalities that they saw was just where they removed the other tumor. I did not think that they were going to be telling me that she had a secondary cancer.

**Sheri Spunt, MD ,MBA, Pediatric Oncologist, Stanford Children's Health:** There's no question that having a supportive family when you're going through something like this is critical.

We put Riley through an incredible array of different treatments and that's really hard, especially for a small child.

**Raffi Avedian, MD, Pediatric Orthopedic Surgeon, Stanford Children's Health:** Riley's treatment plan was that she would get chemotherapy first for about three months, after which time we would do a surgery to remove the tumor and then she would resume with chemotherapy.

So we really needed a team and one of the reasons I enjoy working here so much is I think we have a great sarcoma team. Dr. Sponser, our medical oncologist, myself as a surgeon, Dr. Kosel is our plastic surgeon who helped take care of Riley, as well as our radiation team, pathology team.

**Rohit Khosla, MD, Pediatric Plastic Surgeon, Stanford Children's Health:** In knowing that this was a large tumor, we knew that there was going to be a lot of tissue that was going to be removed and there's going to be a large hole essentially to fill in the inner thigh.

So my role was to come up with a reconstructive plan that would essentially fill that hole and everything went extremely smooth in the surgery. So, we then moved on to the post-operative recovery phase and that was a lengthy recovery which was expected.

**Riley's Mother:** Just staying comfortable, there was a lot of times we were in isolation and she wasn't allowed out of her room.

We happened to hear somebody singing and came knocking on the door and said, "Can we help you out?" And that was it. Her and Rebecca became best friends. That was, she looked for Rebecca every time we were there.

She calmed her down. They would make up songs together about animals or whatever was on their mind. The connection was there instantly for them.

**Scott Hoffinger, MD, Pediatric Orthopedic Surgeon, Stanford Children's Health:** So when I saw Riley, we always have to figure with our complex kids where the orthopedic treatment fits within their overall care plan.

So what had happened with her original cancer was that it had weakened the bone and the ball had slipped. And so what we did is we put a screw across the area we were slipping in the growth center. We hoped it would just at least stop it from moving further, but she has done extremely well. She feels comfortable. She's walking around. She still has her limp, but the pain has gone away.

She was the perfect example of resiliency of the kid. Considering having cancer and having it treated and then having it again, she lets you know it's going to be okay. She lets me know it's going to be okay.

**Sheri Spunt, MD ,MBA, Pediatric Oncologist, Stanford Children's Health:** I want Riley to grow up and be an adult and for the memories of cancer to be all in our past and behind her. I want her to be able to do all the things that any kid wants to do when they grow up.

She was really a rock star.

**Riley:** I want to be a rock star because I'm really good at singing, and I like rock and roll music.

**Riley's Mother:** We brought Riley to us in November and our intention was to adopt her.

Everything really got put on hold because of her diagnosis of the new cancer.

We got her through all of her treatment and surgeries and we're able to adopt her in February of this year.

About This Video

Riley came into foster care at 22 months old, already diagnosed with rhabdomyosarcoma — a soft tissue tumor that had developed in her leg. She was placed with a family in Indiana, then moved to California, where imaging showed the cancer had returned. This video follows her treatment at what is now Stanford Children's Hospital: a sarcoma team that included an orthopedic oncologist, a medical oncologist, a plastic surgeon, and a radiation team. Multiple surgeries. Chemotherapy. Months of recovery. A music therapist who became her closest companion during isolation. A second bone procedure to stop a slipping growth plate. And at the end — she's walking, pain-free, and "lets you know it's going to be okay." Multi-speaker patient story videos are one of the hardest formats in <span class="strong">brand video production</span> to do well. Each person has to contribute something the others don't, and the narrative arc has to hold across what is, clinically, a very complex sequence of events. This one does both.

How do you produce a patient story video for a hospital or healthcare organization?

Structure it as a narrative, not a testimony. Hospital patient story videos fail when they're assembled as a series of talking heads each saying something positive about the institution. The version that works follows a real arc: a named patient, a specific diagnosis, a medical challenge that required the team's expertise, and a concrete outcome. Each clinician speaks to their specific role rather than describing the institution in general terms. The family's voice grounds the emotional stakes without being manipulative. The editing keeps the clinical sequence legible — viewers shouldn't have to work to follow what happened.

What makes a healthcare brand video credible to a prospective patient or family?

Specificity and clinical accuracy. A video that names the diagnosis, describes the procedure, and features the actual doctors who performed it is categorically more credible than one that speaks in generalities about 'world-class care' and 'compassionate teams.' Families researching pediatric care are often in a frightened, information-hungry state. A video that shows them a real case — with the real team — gives them something to evaluate, not just feel. The emotional resonance follows from the specificity, not from soft lighting and inspirational music.

How do you handle multiple speakers in a medical or healthcare brand video?

Give each speaker exactly one job in the story. A sarcoma team video with six speakers works when each one owns a distinct part of the clinical narrative: the orthopedic oncologist on the tumor, the plastic surgeon on reconstruction, the music therapist on recovery support, the family on the emotional experience. When speakers overlap, the video gets repetitive and loses the sense that each member of the team contributed something irreplaceable. The production goal is to make the team feel like a team, not like a PR exercise.

How long should a patient story or brand video be for a hospital?

Three to five minutes for a complex, multi-speaker case. Shorter if the clinical story is simpler. Hospital patient story videos earn their runtime when the medical narrative is genuinely complex — multiple procedures, a recurrence, a multidisciplinary team. Shorter stories don't need that time. The rule is that every minute should introduce something new: a new clinical development, a new voice, a new challenge. A four-minute video where the last minute repeats what the first three established is really a three-minute video.